On January 28, 2025, the Trump administration addressed the numerous drone sightings reported across the United States, particularly in New Jersey. White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt conveyed that these drones were authorized by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) for research and recreational purposes, with some operated by hobbyists and private individuals. The administration emphasized that these drones did not pose a security threat.
However, this explanation leaves several critical questions unanswered. The specific nature of the research conducted, the identities of the private operators, and the reasons for drone activity near sensitive areas, such as military bases (some of which that contained nuclear materials), remain undisclosed. This lack of transparency is concerning, especially considering the initial alarm these sightings caused among residents and the subsequent temporary drone ban imposed by authorities.
Moreover, the administration’s assertion that these drones were authorized and posed no threat seems to contradict earlier actions, such as the temporary drone ban, which suggests that the authorities were uncertain about the drones’ origins and purposes at that time. This inconsistency raises concerns about the possibility of being misled or gaslit by those in power or the Deep State.
In light of these events, it is imperative for the government to provide comprehensive and transparent information regarding the drone sightings. Without full disclosure, public trust erodes, and suspicions of being deliberately misinformed grow stronger. We must stay vigilant and demand accountability to ensure that our concerns are addressed and that we are not subjected to manipulation or deceit which has become something that the people are relating to government discourse more and more.
Dr. Steven Greer, a prominent ufologist and founder of CSETI (Center for the Study of Extraterrestrial Intelligence), has expressed significant concerns regarding the recent drone sightings across the United States. He suggests that these events may be part of a staged operation designed to deceive the public into believing an alien invasion is imminent.
In a recent interview, Dr. Greer emphasized that the situation could escalate within the next 30 days, indicating a potential increase in such deceptive activities. He argues that these orchestrated events serve to distract from covert operations involving advanced technologies that have been kept secret for decades.
Dr. Greer also highlights the role of certain government factions and defense contractors in perpetuating this deception. He asserts that these groups have conducted illegal projects related to unidentified aerial phenomena (UAPs). They do this without proper oversight. The current drone sightings are part of a broader agenda. This agenda aims to mislead the public and maintain secrecy.
Recent activity within the house hearings are trying to make these kind of projects more transparent to the public whilst still protecting the United States defence secrets however if the US president is unable to provide the people of the US and beyond with better evidence then it shows a concerted effort to cover something up.
Unanswered questions
Many questions surrounding the recent drone incursions remain unanswered, despite yesterday’s official statement. Below, I’ve outlined key issues that were either overlooked or deliberately avoided. Whether this omission is intentional or due to a lack of knowledge, it raises serious concerns. If the U.S. government cannot—or will not—provide clear answers, we must ask ourselves: What are they hiding, or do they genuinely not know?
Who exactly was operating the drones?
- The government claims they were authorized by the FAA for research and recreational purposes, but no specifics have been provided about the operators. Were they private contractors, military, or intelligence agencies?
What kind of research was being conducted?
- If these drones were part of an official research program, what was their purpose? Why were they flying near sensitive locations?
Why was there initial confusion among authorities?
- Law enforcement and local officials appeared unaware of the drones’ origins at first, leading to temporary bans and increased public concern. If the drones were authorized, why wasn’t this communicated earlier?
Why were they flying in restricted airspace?
- Some sightings occurred near critical infrastructure and military installations. If the drones were harmless, why were they allowed to operate in these areas?
Why were they seen in multiple locations across the U.S. at the same time?
- Reports suggest similar drone incursions in other states, raising questions about whether this was a coordinated effort.
Why did the government wait to provide an explanation?
- If there was no security risk, why did it take time for the administration to issue a statement? Was there internal debate over how to frame the incident?
Could this be part of a larger psychological operation (PSYOP)?
- Experts like Dr. Steven Greer suggest the drone sightings may be linked to a staged operation to manipulate public perception of UAPs. Is there any evidence supporting this theory?
Senator Jon Bramnick of New Jersey
New Jersey State Senator Jon Bramnick has voiced significant concerns regarding the recent drone sightings over the state. He has called for a “limited state of emergency” to ban all drones until the public receives a satisfactory explanation for these occurrences.
Senator Bramnick has expressed frustration with the federal government’s response, suggesting that authorities may be withholding information due to fear of public reaction. He has urged the Department of Defense to be transparent with the American people about these drones, emphasizing that the lack of clear communication is more alarming than the uncertainty itself.
Despite federal assurances that the drones do not pose a threat, Bramnick remains dissatisfied with the vague explanations provided and continues to advocate for more decisive action and transparency from the government.
A Call to Action: Demand the Truth About the Drone Incursions
The time for blind trust is over. The recent drone incursions over New Jersey—and similar unexplained incidents elsewhere—have raised far more questions than answers. Yet, the US government’s response has been vague, dismissive, and wholly inadequate. If these drones were harmless, why were officials initially unaware of them? If they pose no threat, why were temporary bans imposed? And if this is just routine research, why won’t they disclose who is behind it?
This isn’t just an issue for the United States—it affects all of us. The UK has had its own share of mysterious aerial incidents, and time and again, governments on both sides of the Atlantic have evaded serious scrutiny. Whether this is a national security failure, a covert military operation, or something even more concerning, the public deserves the truth. We must demand answers.
What Can We Do?
Press our MPs for transparency – Demand that the UK government acknowledges and investigates the implications of these incidents.
Raise awareness – Share this issue widely. The more voices demanding the truth, the harder it is for officials to dismiss us.
Push for independent scrutiny – Government agencies cannot be the only ones in control of the narrative. Experts and independent investigators must be allowed to examine the evidence.
Refuse to be gaslit – Do not let media spin or government denials convince you that your concerns are unfounded. Stay vigilant.
Our leaders serve us—not the other way around. If they refuse to be honest about what’s happening in our skies, it’s time to hold them to account. Stand up. Speak out. Demand the truth.
